Is there a reason why you use protoplasts from leaves as opposed
to from cell cultures? (We have found it easier to make protoplasts
from cell cultures.)
A1. It takes time and
patience to develop any protoplast assay and I believe that
either leaf protoplasts or cell-culture protoplasts could
work if people have sufficient knowledge about the physiology
of plant cells and are willing to spend the time to figure
things out. I have been working with mesophyll protoplasts
for the past 15 years and I found them convenient to work
with since they are abundant, easy to isolate, and can respond
to numerous signals in a similar manner as intact leaves.
I don't think there is a "corresponding cell type" for any
of the plant cell culture lines. In reality, they are "tumor
lines" (similar to many of the mammalian cell lines) because
they need to continue to divide indefinitely to be useful.
I also like the idea of keeping everything "stored" as seeds
and just grow them whenever needed. It usually takes a skilled
and dedicated person to keep the cell culture lines alive
and to make sure the genetic stability in a lab. Seeds are
low maintenance, genetically stable, and can provide all types
of tissues/cells. There seems to be more labs spending the
time to develop cell culture lines, especially for Arabidopsis.
It may work out better when more people are doing it. The
parsley, maize (Black Mexican Sweet and A188), soybean, carrot,
tomato, and tobacco BY2 cell lines have been around for a
long time and are all very robust systems. It's the matter
of having someone committed to it. Choosing leaf mesophyll
protoplasts is my personal preference. It's more "physiological"
since one can use "differentiated cells" for specific responses
and assays. For instance, etiolated or greening maize mesophyll
protoplasts have the best response to light and photosynthesis
gene promoters are most active in these protoplasts. For universal
signaling pathways, it does not matter which type of cells
are used. It should all work.
Does it matter whether you incubate your protoplasts in the
light or dark after transformation?
A2. It depends on your
purposes. You have to think about what kind of assays you
are doing and whether it makes sense to do it in the dark
or light and how much light and what kind of light are appropriate.
If you are not sure about what condition to use, the only
way to find out is to try different conditions. In general,
strong light is not a good idea (less than 100 uE is better)
for protoplasts. For most of our transient assays (we focus
on early responses), the experiments are done between 2 to
12 hours. Just be aware that if the plant growth or cell culture
condition changes, protoplast responses may change. The consistency
of any assay is mostly relied on the plant materials and growth
conditions. Our protoplast isolation and PEG transformation
method has been streamlined and it usually is not the problem
when an assay fails.
Do you find that PEG transformation works significantly better
than electroporation on Arabidopsis protoplasts?
A3. I spent a lot of time trying to find the best
electroporation condition for Arabidopsis protoplasts since
I like it better than the PEG method (Machine is still more
reliable than human hands and I was worried about the use
of too much calcium needed for PEG transformation). With maize
protoplasts, we can carry out 100 samples in 30 min with consistency.
However, I don't think I can really recommend anything that
works well for Arabidopsis at the moment. I did find a condition
that is described in the Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplast
protocol. However, I have pretty much given up using it as
a routine protocol since it's not always easy to obtain reproducible
results. For each cell type and each plant, you need to figure
it out empirically and it takes a lot of time. I have not
yet tried protoplasts isolated from culture lines. You may
give it a try and it may turn out to be easier.
We have been using Arabidopsis protoplasts for resistance
response studies. We generally do not get great gene expression
changes (compared to using intact tissues) with protoplasts.
After seeing your Nature paper, we are wondering whether our
protoplast culture conditions are significantly different.
We use a medium consisting of 4 mM MES (pH 5.6), 10 mM KCl
(sometimes, using Mg salts), and 0.4-0.5 M mannitol and leave
it at room temperature under light. What conditions do you
use? Do you have any other suggestions?
A4. The details of the medium is written in our
standard Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplast protocol that can
be downloaded from our website (http://genetics.mgh.harvard.edu/sheenweb/).
Our studies on innate immune responses have been focused on
the use the flg22 peptide elicitor discovered by Thomas Boller's
lab. This elicitor stimulates robust general defense responses
and can activate both endogenous early defense response genes
and corresponding reporter genes in Arabidopsis protoplasts.
Similar gene activation is also found in intact leaves. I
do not know which elicitor you used and which genes you are
studying. Without any information, it is difficult for me
to come up with a precise answer. However, we are planning
to check other elicitors and pathogen-derived signals to test
the protoplast system further.
Aren't protoplasts stressed already during isolation? Aren't
protoplasts dead after isolation? What kind of physiological
responses can you get in mesophyll protoplasts?
A5. We are careful when
cutting the leaves and not to "wound" them. When the cell
walls are digested, there are signals released and there may
be some stress responses occurring in protoplasts. However,
don't forget that plant cells are pretty resilient and many
stress responses are transient and reversible. Using vital
staining and physiological assays, we found that isolated
mesophyll protoplasts are alive and dynamic. The "stress levels"
of protoplasts can be precisely monitored and quantitated
by RT-PCR or by testing different stress responsive gene promoters
fused to sensitive reporter genes, e.g., LUC encoding the
firefly luciferase. We have shown in several published papers
that mesophyll protoplasts respond sensitively to diverse
stress signals, including heat, H2O2, salt, darkness, cold,
elicitors, ETOH, and osmotic stress. They also respond to
stress hormones, such as ABA and ethylene, and growth hormones,
such as auxin and cytokinin, in similar manner as intact leaves.
Does the protoplasting procedure damage surface components
such as plasma membrane receptors?
A6. Our studies of the flg22 peptide receptor
FLS2, a plasma membrane LRR receptor kinase, demonstrate that the receptors on the
surface of protoplasts are intact and can actively perceive specific extracellular
signals to trigger intracellular signaling cascades. We further showed that the
plasmid expressing WT FLS2 receptor can complement the fls2 protoplasts after 6 h
transient expression and trigger similar downstream signaling responses.
Aren't the majority of Arabidopsis protoplasts in any given
preparation so badly damaged that they are incompetent to
undergo cell wall regeneration and further cell division?
Aren't the protoplasts heterogeneous?
A7. Using proper plant
materials and methods for protoplast isolation and culturing,
several labs have demonstrated that Arabidopsis mesophyll
protoplasts can undergo cell wall regeneration and further
cell division (see references cited in the protocol). For
our transient expression analyses that occur in 2-12 h after
DNA transfection, we do not wish to stimulate cell wall regeneration
and cell division, which can be carried out by proper plant
hormone treatments and takes much longer to occur. Our purpose
here is to maintain protoplasts as "differentiated" leaf cells
similar to those in intact plants and not to alter the fate
of mesophyll protoplasts. The cells we used for the experiments
are pure (>95%) mesophyll protoplasts. Other types of cells
(e.g., guard cells, epidermal cells, vascular tissue cells,
etc.) cannot be released using the procedure. The homogeneity
of the protoplast population can be easily examined under
I think my protoplast isolation is working OK because they
appear healthy for at least 3-4 days (they are spherical with
a clearly visible plasma membrane and green chloroplasts).
I resuspend the protoplasts in 400 mM Mannitol, 15mM MgCl2,
5mM MES (pH5.6) and then use 250 ul aliquots (5 x105 cells)
for each transformation but I did not get good results.
A8. For standard Arabidopsis
transfection by PEG, we use 1-4 x 104 cells for each transfection
(10 times less than what you and other people used. See the
protocol for details). So, one million protoplasts could be
100 samples for us but may only be used as one sample by other
scientists. It's probably a good idea for you to test the
best ratio for DNA/protoplasts. Depending on your DNA and
protoplast quality, more cells are not always better, often
Do you use specific PEG? Do you use carrier DNA? Is there
any difference if I use CaCl2 instead of Ca(NO3)2?
A9. We have used PEG
4000 from Fluka since 1996 (see the protocol). I think the
quality of PEG is very important but you can try it out yourself.
We don't use carrier DNA and CaCl2 works fine.
I autoclaved the PEG/mannitol stock. Is it a good idea? Do
I need to keep everything sterile?
A10. It is probably a
bad idea to autoclave PEG as the PH can change dramatically.
Please check the PH of your PEG solution, especially if all
your cells die after PEG transfection. For 2-12 h of incubation
time, sterilization is not necessary.
When I do the PEG transfection, I leave it for 30 min at RT
then dilute with W5 buffer over another 30 min. Is it necessary?
A11. I have always wondered
about the "old" procedure for PEG transfection. The best way
to find out is to try it out yourself! When I was streamlining
the protocol to make everything simple and fast, I found that
3 min transfection actually worked better than the "standard"
60 min transfection. Find it out yourself how much more time
you can actually save!
What is the percentage of protoplasts that stay healthy after
PEG transfection? What is your PEG transfection efficiency?
I have stained for GUS activity and can only see a handful
(<0.001%) that is clearly blue. I have also done MUG assays
and these also show equally poor levels of GUS expression
(barely above background!). I would be extremely grateful
if you could provide me with some tips that might help me
improve my abysmal transformation efficiency.
A12. For healthy protoplasts,
over 50% protoplasts should stay intact after PEG transfection.
If your protoplasts are all broken after PEG transfection,
I recommend that you check out your plant materials and start
again. If a protoplast experiment fails, the plant material
is more likely the problem instead of the protocol (if you
follow our protocol). We routinely obtain 40-80% transfection
efficiency using Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts. It is
a good idea to follow precisely the standard protocol that
is now very simple. Many people claimed that they followed
the protocol but very often changed some steps "unconsciously".
For example, people would use ten times more cells than what
is written in the protocol. More is not always equal to better!!
Is GUS a good reporter gene to assess protoplast transfection
A13. Personally, I prefer
to use the engineered GFP that is a vital marker, has no diffusion
problem, and is100 fold brighter than the original jellyfish
GFP (Chiu et al., 1996).
How early can I start to detect gene expression in transfected
A14. It depends on the
amount of DNA you use and the type of genes you introduce.
I can detect LUC reporter gene expression as early as 30 min
after DNA transfection and as early as 1-2 h for GFP expression.
However, each reporter gene and response may be different
and you need to spend some time to figure out what the optimal
incubation time is for you assays.
While I think about it, could you let me know what method
of plasmid prep you routinely use? I have had some variable
results using different preparation methods. For example,
when I prepared the DNA using a Qiagen maxiprep my transformation
efficiencies were really low.
A15. The columns are
convenient but they are still too expensive for routine use
since we make hundreds and thousands of maxipreps in the lab.
I also heard from one postdoc in my lab that the Qiagen prep
caused some problems. We always use the CsCl gradient for
plasmid DNA purification but I encourage people to experiment
themselves. We need a lot of DNA (at least 2 mg to carry our
serious experiments). Make sure that you remove the salt though.
Both mini- and maxi-prep protocols for plasmid DNA isolation
from our lab can be downloaded from the new website.
Why the pH of the PEG solution is not specified? Should it
be in the range of 8-9 "as usual"? With tobacco mesophyll
protoplast (and PEG from Merck) we routinely adjust to 9 with
A16. As I indicated in
the protocol, we have streamlined the protocol: which means
to eliminate whatever steps that are not necessary and time
consuming (which takes years of work). We don't just do experiments
"as usual". We ask questions constantly whether any step is
necessary and whether there is a better way to do it more
efficient and obtain better results. We then test ideas and
find answers. For instance, have you asked the simple question
"why pH 9"? Without adjusting the pH, our PEG solution pH
is around 6, which is very close to the pH of all solutions
that we are using (pH 5.7). At least for our protocol, using
PEG at pH 9 is unnecessary. You can do a comparison yourself
and that's always the best way to find reliable answers.
I wonder about the enzymes cellulase and macerozyme R10, what
does R10 mean?
A17. I think it's the
name of the fungal strain. You can write to the Japanese company
for a sure answer of your question.
For my barley protoplast prep I used enzymes that were purchased
from Calbiochem but you have referred to a company in Japan.
Are the enzymes from Calbiochem too strong?
A18. You can try the
ones from Calbiochem or any other companies and see whether
you like the results. We only use the enzymes from Japan routinely
For my fractionations (I use different size filters) do you
think W5 or WI is the best buffer to use?
A19. Arabidopsis protoplasts
look better in W5 (with lots of calcium). However, we avoid
W5 when we do experiments that are calcium sensitive. We don't
usually use W5 for monocot protoplasts (maize, rice, barley
and wheat) but you can give it a try (again the best way of
Do we need to visit your lab to learn how to carry out experiments
A20. The truth is that
there is no "magic" in my lab. After we test a new protocol
extensively, we publish and share it with the plant community.
We even got rejected when we wanted to share our experience
of using GFP as a vital maker many years ago. The reason for
rejection was that no one else could show that it worked in
plants! Now, using GFP in plants is a common practice. I imagine
that using protoplasts will be common for plant experiments
in the future. For anybody who has the desire to establish
the protoplast system in her/his lab, the detailed protocols
published on our lab website should provide sufficient instruction.
The protocol has been streamlined and is very simple now.
The key for success is all the same basic stuff in conducting
good plant research: grow healthy plants, make clean DNA,
practice until you feel comfortable with the system, and repeat
the experiments until you figure out the story. The standard
recommendation is to grow plants every week, observe them
every day, and practice as often as you could. My observation
of the lab members is that it could take a few months to a
year to master the skills (faster than learning to play a
violin and it's quiet), depending on how observing, patient,
and committed you are. Arabidopsis plants are very sensitive
to changes in growth conditions, thus most of the time the
problem is the starting plant material. The quality of your
DNA is also extremely important for the success of the experiments.
We always compare the protoplast responses to intact plant
responses to make sure that we are seeing physiological activities.
For gene expression, you can compare the reporter gene with
endogenous gene activities in the same protoplasts. To start
with, you can request a GFP or LUC construct from our lab
or find it on your campus. We have sent out clones for numerous
requests worldwide over the years and these controls are good
for testing both dicot and monocot protoplasts. You will always
get a permission to use them freely for basic research.
We have been using your protocol for monocot protoplast isolation
and have had very good success. We are now trying to electroporate
the protoplasts and are having problems with protoplast survival.
Our electroporator is a Bio-Rad Gene Pulser II. We have tried
a range of settings from 200-400 Volt and 100-200 uF. We cannot
set the pulse time, but the result is a range of 56.9-25.2 msec.
When we observed the cells after electroporation, we saw clumps
of lysed cells. Any suggestions?
A21. When using electroporation,
you need to test the condition for each plant species and
cell types. My 1991 Plant Cell paper provided some general
guidelines. The protocol is also available on our lab website.
It is important to set the pulse time for less than 5 msec.
Capacitance does not matter too much when using 200 uF or
more, but the higher settings slow downs the re-charge. For
smaller protoplasts (10-20 u), higher voltage (400-500 Volt)
could be applied. The bigger the cells, the lower the voltage
should be used. We use an old Promega machine that was no
longer available in the market. However, there are many other
companies that produce electroporators with a pulse time control.
Home-made ones will work too and are cheaper. For electroporating
monocot leaf protoplast, we found that the use of etiolated
and greening tissues is easier. Adding more KCl could help
with dicot leaf protoplasts (Arabidopsis and tobacco).
I am using the protoplast transfection protocol (Yoo et al., 2007)
and encountering a problem. I hope you could help me troubleshoot this.
The protoplast isolation works very well, however, after transfection most
of the protoplasts are 'exploded'. I am trying to express a GFP-expressing
construct and I need to incubate the transfected protoplast for 20 hours.
After this incubation, most of the protoplasts are destroyed. I should
mention that I am using PEG 4000 from Sigma to transfect Arabidopsis
A22. The health of protoplasts is mainly
determined by the plant growth conditions. When others have encountered problems, we have
found that often what we have recommended has not been followed,
e.g., not more than 12 h light photoperiod and less than 75 u mol/m2s light along
with choice of correct leaves at the correct age, and water only without salt. You can
download the movie we provided on the Sheen lab website, showing what the plants
should look like.
You can run a "no PEG control" to see whether the protoplast burst is due to PEG
or DNA or just the protoplasts alone. If the protoplasts did not last, then it's
a problem with plant growth. If protoplasts are fine without PEG or DNA, then
the problem is with the quality of your PEG or DNA (both are very critical).
Our protocol has specific recommendations for the quality of PEG and DNA, and
caution should be taken before deviating from them. However, there is not a
uniform way that will work for everyone's needs, so you can figure out what you
can do in your own lab by trying some variations.
Growing healthy plants and following the protocol precisely is the key.
Sigma sells many types of PEG and most of them are not good. We also suggest
using the protoplasts for 3-6 h for "transient" expression assays. Any
experiment taking 20 hr to do means you have additional considerations to address,
as we don't recommend this long a time period with our protocol. Many more
issues need to be considered.
It will be useful to read this FAQ webpage completely and download the protocol
and movie. There are lots of details and troubleshooting tips from our 25 years
I find that sometimes it is difficult to pass to the enzyme solution
through a filter for sterilization, and sometimes it is easy. When it
is easy, I am able to get many protoplasts, but when it is difficult
the digestion does not work well - the enzyme solution is not very
green, even after an overnight incubation. I believe I am following the
protocol in the same way each time. Is this something that you have
experienced, or do you know what may be the cause?
A23. Your observation was consistent with what we have experienced in the past,
and the answer can be found in the "Enzyme solution" part of the protocols
(both the web protocol and 2007 Nature Protocol) and also highlighted in the protoplast movie ( which can be downloaded from the Sheen Lab website. http://molbio.mgh.harvard.edu/sheenweb/protocols_reg.html ).
Heat the enzyme solution at 55oC for 10 min to enhance enzyme solubility and cool to
room temperature before adding CaCl2 and carrying out the filtering step.
I'd recommend studying the protocols carefully, keeping the tips in mind, and
watching the 22-min movie before starting your protoplast experiments.
We also do not recommend carrying out protoplast digestion for overnight as
indicated in your e-mail.
Q24. I'm about to start working on protoplast
preparation and transfection. I'm now ordering essential chemicals and enzymes and I would like to know
where you purchased your cellulase R-10 and macerozyme R-10 ? I would like to order from Yakult but there is
no catalog # and price information on their web site, so I sent an email but I'm still waiting for an answer.
I also tried to call but I was unable to speak to somebody who speaks English. So I would like to know if you
are ordering these enzymes from Yakult directly or if another company sells these enzymes manufactured by Yakult.
Also, if you buy these through Yakult directly maybe you already have the information I need to order them and
maybe you can share this information with me.
A24. Please download our updated protocol,
"Transient Expression in Arabidopsis Mesophyll Protoplasts". You can do this after a quick free registration.
On page 6, section E. Enzymes and nylon filters, of the updated protocol you will find the following:
Here is what we ordered:(They call it "DESCRIPTION OF GOODS")
CELLULASE"ONOZUKA"R-10 (100g) (for Arabidopsis and dicot leaves)
CELLULASE"ONOZUKA"RS (100g) (for maize and monocot leaves)
MACEROZYME R-10 (100g) (for both dicot and monocot leaves)
The Cellulase and macerozyme are purchased from:
Yakult Pharmaceutical IND. CO., LTD.
Shinbashi MCV Building
5-13-5 Shinbashi Minato-Ku
Tel 03-5470-8911 (international call 81-3-5470-8911)
Fax 03-5470-8921 (international fax 81-3-5470-8921)
The purchasing process can take up to a few weeks.
You can pay for express mail delivery, which takes 3-7 days.
You can send an e-mail ( email@example.com ) or call ( 81-3-5470-8911 ) to make an order request.
If you don’t speak Japanese (I do not), please be very patient and insist on asking for someone who can speak
English with you to make the order. Speaking slowly and politely is the key!!
Deputy General Manager
Deputy Manager of Technical Department
(Note that over the years the managers may change.)
Yakult Pharmaceutical Ind.Co,LTD.
You may order re-packaged Yakult enzymes from other companies (Google search),
but our experience is that they are sold in a smaller package (10g) and are much more expensive.
I have a simple question that at first sight was not important for me.
How do you store and handle the enzymes (cellulase and macerase) in your lab?
Do you prepare small aliquots? I'm using the enzymes from Yakult and the company
suggested to keep them a room temp as they are reported to be stable for two years.
Well, after one year their activity seems to be significantly reduced
(leaf material requires longer and longer times to be digested and sometimes it is
only partially digested, moreover transfection efficiency is getting worse).
A25. As a common practice, after opening each
100 g bottle, I store the enzyme powder in 5 g aliquots at -20oC in tightly capped
plastic tubes. I never keep any enzyme at room temperature for short-term or long-term
(>1-2 years) storage. I've used these enzymes for over 30 years and have never observed
a significant activity decrease when they have been stored over 1-2 years. Most of the
digestion problems that people have reported were mainly due to incomplete dissolution
of the enzyme powder, which can be improved by heating at 55oC in solution for 10 min
(see the protocol). For longer-term storage, I keep the enzyme powder at -20oC, but
I also keep a 5 g tube at 4oC as the "working " stock. When aliquoting the 100 g enzyme
powder bottle, I bring out the bottle from -20oC and let it "thaw" to room temperature
before aliquoting the powder into 5 g tubes. For regular use, a frozen 5 g tube is "thawed"
and stored at 4oC.
Does it matter whether the protoplast lysis buffer has 25 mM or 2.5 mM Tris-phosphate?
A26. For both LUC and GUS assays, the activities
are much higher when 25 mM Tris-phosphate is used for protoplast lysis.
In the Arabidopsis Protoplast Protocol that you can download from the Sheen Lab website,
the lysis buffer was referred to the Promega LUC protocol (Promega Technical Bulletin
TB281, p. 12) available on the website
( http://www.promega.com/resources/protocols/technical-bulletins/0/luciferase-assay-system-protocol/ ).
Luciferase Cell Culture Lysis Reagent, 1X
25 mM Tris-phosphate (pH 7.8)
2 mM DTT
2 mM 1,2-diaminocyclohexane-N,N,N´,N´-tetraacetic acid
1% Triton® X-100